Partners and pilots
Clinical Corvus is in limited beta. We are looking for partners who want to evaluate a bounded clinical workflow with human review, predefined success criteria, and governance suited to the local environment.
Where a pilot starts
The recommended entry point is an acute-care team that already prepares rounds or handoffs from fragmented information. A pilot can begin with clipboard and documents without deep EHR integration.
A pilot should not begin with autonomous diagnosis, treatment execution, or replacement of the official medical record.
Questions the pilot should answer
- Does the team prepare and review rounds with less manual reconstruction?
- Do I-PASS drafts reduce omissions and rework?
- Are retrieved sources relevant and easy to verify?
- Do uncertainty, missing context, and insufficient evidence appear at the right time?
- Do privacy, tenant, and audit controls meet the evaluated setting?
What we provide for evaluation
- a documented boundary between support, caution, and blocking;
- editable drafts with clinical review;
- context, evidence, and execution traces when available;
- telemetry for reviewing failures, corrections, and response paths;
- explicit criteria for limiting or stopping the pilot.
What we do not yet claim
We do not claim prospective clinical effectiveness, proven reduction in adverse events, superiority over competitors, regulatory or compliance certification, or uniform coverage across clinical workflows.
Next step
Before starting, the partner and Clinical Corvus team should define the workflow, population, permitted data, users, measures, duration, review owners, and exit criteria.
Contact us to discuss a pilot, technical review, or research partnership.